Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Signs of sulfur fractionation under high magnetic field strength.

Created on 03 Jul 2026

Authors

Dominik Orlovskij, Andy To, David Long

Published in

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences. Volume 384. Issue 2323. Jul 02, 2026.

Abstract

Sulfur, with a first ionization potential (FIP) of 10.36 eV, lies at the boundary between low- and high-FIP elements, making it particularly sensitive to fractionation processes in the solar atmosphere. Sulfur exhibits variable behaviour across solar environments, with coronal remote sensing studies often observing it as a high-FIP element, while in situ measurements sometimes detect low-FIP-like enhancement. Sulfur also exhibits variable behaviour during flares and magnetic restructuring. To understand sulfur's variations, we quantify how sulfur's FIP bias depends on potential field source surface (PFSS)-derived loop properties. We analyse nine Hinode/EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) raster observations using four diagnostic line pairs (Si x 258.37 Å /S x 264.23 Å, S xi 188.68 Å /Ar xi 188.81 Å, Ca xiv 193.87 Å /Ar xiv 194.40 Å and Fe xvi 262.98 Å /S xiii 256.69 Å), with FIP biases derived using differential emission measures (DEM) calculated via regularized inversion. Our results show that the abundance of low-FIP elements, including sulfur, decreases above approximately 150 G relative to the high-FIP element Ar, while showing no dependence on loop length. This provides evidence that FIP fractionation is modulated by the mean magnetic field strength of the coronal loops. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Solar atmospheric abundances in space and time'.

PMID:
42391546
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement