Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Longitudinal characterization of tumor vascular adaptation using superfine magnetic resonance angiography.

Created on 03 Jul 2026

Authors

Xin Tian, Natsuo Banura, Shigeyoshi Saito, Atsushi Mahara

Published in

Scientific reports. Jul 02, 2026. Epub Jul 02, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to establish a noninvasive magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) framework for monitoring tumor vascular adaptation longitudinally using the intravascular supramolecular contrast agent 8-arm PEG-FGd3. (1) Unlike conventional Gd-chelates, which predominantly enhanced tumor tissue because of contrast extravasation, 8-arm PEG-FGd3 provided high-contrast delineation of tumor-feeding vessels and microvascular architecture, visualizing tumor vessels as small as 190 μm. (2) This is the first instance of defining neovascularization patterns in superfine MRA images. (3) The longitudinal atlas of tumor vessels varied over time. In the fast-growing stage, both tumor doubling time and vessel doubling time were positive, vessels initiated neovascularization processes such as vessel co-option-like appearance, sprouting-like appearance, and elongation-tortuosity-like change. In the slow-growing stage, vessel doubling time turned negative, vessels became more structured, with continued elongation-tortuosity. Vessel remodeling followed vascular disruption rapidly. In the shrinkage stage, vessel loss preceded tumor shrinkage. (4) Seven days post-ligation, there were more vessels than the second day. ANG2 also showed a increasing tendency during this period, while VEGF was decreasing but still higher than that in the tumor without ligation, although there was no significant difference.

PMID:
42393255
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement