Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome and lung cancer: does the risk meet the threshold for lung cancer screening?

Authors

Faizah Shareef, Mounica Konjeti, Samir Gupta, Jennifer M Weiss

Published in

Familial cancer. Volume 25. Issue 3. Jul 03, 2026. Epub Jul 03, 2026.

Abstract

Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) is caused by germline pathogenic variants in the STK11 gene and is associated with elevated lifetime risks for several cancers, including lung cancer. Currently, no formal recommendations exist for lung cancer screening in PJS. This structured narrative review compares lung cancer risk in PJS with lung cancer risk in individuals currently eligible for screening based on age and smoking history. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from 1/1/1980 to 9/11/2023 using the terms "Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome" AND "Cancer." Studies reporting lung cancer risk in PJS were included. Reported lung cancer risks were compared to 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime lung cancer risks in the general population based on age and pack-years of smoking. Seventeen studies were included. Across the studies, the incidence of lung cancer ranged from 0.8 to 13.3%. Studies that included lung cancer risk relative to the general population reported a relative risk range of 2.9-22.9. Cumulative risk was reported in 5 studies and surpassed 5% by age 60 (range 7 to 17%). Guidelines for low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening for individuals aged 50-80 with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years are associated with a similar or higher threshold for lung cancer risk. The lifetime lung cancer risk for individuals with PJS is similar to current guideline-based risk thresholds for screening based on age and smoking status. Given their elevated lifetime risk, individuals with PJS may be candidates for LDCT for lung cancer screening and should be formally studied to elucidate the risks, benefits, and optimal implementation in this patient population.

PMID:
42397638
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 03 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.