Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Endometrial Mesonephric-like Carcinosarcoma With Shared KRAS, TP53, and RB1 Mutations: Report of a Rare Case Highlighting Diagnostic Challenges and Novel Molecular Insights, and Review of the Literature.

Created on 04 Jul 2026

Authors

Zitong Zhao, Timothy Kwang Yong Tay, Tony Kiat Hon Lim, Liang Seah Tay, Gek San Tan, Wui Seng Khoo, Inny Busmanis, Shing Lih Wong

Published in

International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. Jul 03, 2026. Epub Jul 03, 2026.

Abstract

Mesonephric-like carcinosarcoma (MLCS) is an uncommon gynecologic malignancy comprising mesonephric-like adenocarcinomatous (MLA) and high-grade (HG) sarcomatous elements. We describe an endometrial MLCS in a 63-yr-old woman showing divergent p53 immunohistochemical expression, with abnormal expression in the MLA component and normal expression in the sarcomatous component. Dedifferentiated carcinoma and uterine mesenchymal tumors are primary differential diagnoses when sarcomatous elements predominate or exhibit round-cell morphology. A review of 25 endometrial MLCS cases, including ours, showed advanced-stage presentation in 48% (12/25), recurrence in 60% (15/25) and disease-related death in 28% (7/25) of cases, underscoring its aggressive behavior. Heterologous differentiation occurred in 16% of cases but was not essential for diagnosis when unequivocal HG sarcomatous cells were present. Component-specific next-generation sequencing of our case revealed identical KRAS, TP53, and RB1 mutations in both components, with additional PTPRT mutation and KLF5 amplification restricted to the MLA component, representing a novel molecular signature with potential therapeutic implications.

PMID:
42397978
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement