Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Created on 04 Jul 2026

Authors

Shanshan Liu, Noriki Nishida, Fei Cheng, Utsuro Takehito, Yuji Matsumoto

Published in

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). Jul 03, 2026. Epub Jul 03, 2026.

Abstract

Mention-agnostic biomedical concept recognition (MA-BCR) requires inferring ontology concepts directly from passages, without relying on explicit mention spans. Prior work has mainly focused on generative and classification-based approaches. Ranking-based methods typically use a retrieve-rerank pipeline, and this paradigm has not been systematically studied for MA-BCR. Consequently, it remains unclear how ranking-based approaches compare with existing paradigms and what types of supervision are most beneficial for ranker training under limited annotation settings.
Through a systematic comparison of ranking-, generative-, and classification-based paradigms, we show that a two-stage retrieve-rerank architecture is the most robust and scalable backbone for MA-BCR. Building on this finding, we propose ENR, an error-aware negative-enhanced ranking framework that augments training with false positives collected from heterogeneous recognizers, improving reranking performance without increasing inference-time cost. Experiments on MM-HPO and MM-GO (two datasets derived from MedMentions-ST21pv) demonstrate that ENR substantially outperforms prior approaches.
Code and data are available at https://github.com/sl-633/enr-recognizer or https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20730803.
Supplementary materials are available at Supplemental_Materials.pdf.

PMID:
42398028
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement