Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Translated article] Functionality in patients over 60 years of age with distal radius fracture treated with and without surgery: scoping review.

Created on 04 Jul 2026

Authors

K Quelal A, E Jiménez, E Vergara-Amador

Published in

Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia. Jul 03, 2026. Epub Jul 03, 2026.

Abstract

Distal radius fracture is the most common in women over 50 years, accounting for up to 18% of all fractures in the elderly. The objective of this study is to compare the functional results of patients over 60 years with distal radius fracture after conservative treatment versus surgical treatment.
A review of the literature of articles published between 2015 and 2022 related to the PICO question posed «Functionality in patients over 60 years of age with distal radius fracture with conservative treatment compared with surgical treatment». The eligibility criteria were: population over 60 years old, post-management functionality such as pain, grip strength, alignment, need for a new procedure, among others.
The search generated 119 articles, and after filtering for duplication, title and abstract or that did not comply with inclusion criteria. The remaining 10 articles met the eligibility criteria, applied conservative or surgical management for distal radius fractures in a population over 60 years of age and answered the research question posed.
The results reported are similar in terms of recovery of functionality of the wrist and hand in these patients after follow-up, however, most of the authors found that patients had lower scores on the DASH scale (less disability) and better grip strength in patients subjected to open reduction and internal fixation with palmar plate.

PMID:
42398570
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement