Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.

Authors

Michael D Linderman, Sophia M Adelson, Tala M Berro, Jennifer L Anderson, Scott D Crawford, Tshaka J Cunningham, Edward D Esplin, Altovise T Ewing-Crawford, Daiva E Nielsen, Stacey Pereira, Tara Schmidlen, Heather Andrighetti, Steven B Bleyl, George M Church, Eden V Haverfield, Madhuri Hegde, Lazaridis N Konstantinos, Paul Kruszka, Debra Leonard, Thomas May, Molly McGinniss, Vaibhav Pandya, Eric E Schadt, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Bethany Zettler, Amy L McGuire, Robert C Green, PeopleSeq Study Team

Published in

BMC medical genomics. Jul 03, 2026. Epub Jul 03, 2026.

Abstract

Elective genomic sequencing (EGS) returns monogenic disease findings in multiple genes, including potentially novel variants, and may also provide participants with carrier status, pharmacogenomic and other health-related information. The PeopleSeq Study assessed participants' motivations for and concerns about EGS and the associated clinical and psychosocial outcomes across diverse EGS providers.
We administered a shared questionnaire to participants who chose to undergo EGS via 18 academic, clinical, or commercial EGS platforms.
We enrolled 1575 participants, of whom 1147 (72.8%) completed a questionnaire after receiving their EGS results. A majority (60.3%) of the participants who completed a post-result questionnaire self-reported receiving results they assessed as important, including negative findings, and 75.9% reported a form of health-related utility. Among a subset (19.4%) who shared their EGS reports, 16.6% (37 of n = 223) received a monogenic finding and self-reported results deemed "important" were consistent with EGS reports. Most participants (74.1%) discussed their results with their family, but fewer discussed their results with a healthcare provider other than the site team (41.7%) or had one or more medical visits as a direct result of their EGS testing (23.1%). Participants expressed diverse motivations for EGS, with 91.4% expressing interest in their personal disease risk and 54% who expressed quasi-indication-based motivations related to family medical history. Individuals motivated by family history reported important results at a significantly higher rate.
Early adopters of EGS are motivated by general interest in their health as well as quasi-indication-based considerations such as family history. A majority of participants learned results they considered medically important, but a much smaller segment engaged healthcare providers with their results.

PMID:
42400015
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 04 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.