Toward Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Grading Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Development and Validation Study.

Authors

Siyu Dai, Dewei Lu, Wei Zheng, Jian Lv, Bingqin Huang, Ronghua Mu, Danyi Huang, Peijia Li, Yuling Feng, Peng Yang, Xin Li, Xiqi Zhu, Xiaoyan Qin

Published in

Clinical genitourinary cancer. Pages 102598. Jun 11, 2026. Epub Jun 11, 2026.

Abstract

To develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for distinguishing prostate cancer (PCa) with Gleason Score (GS) ≤ 3+4 from those with GS ≥ 4+3, and to explore the predictive value and biological significance of core radiomic features.
This study enrolled a retrospective multicenter cohort, including 225 PCa patients. Two radiologists manually segmented intratumoral and peritumoral regions of interest on T2-weighted imaging and extracted radiomic features. We built machine learning models by integrating clinical variables with intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features. To enhance model interpretability, we used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), correlation analysis, and mediation analysis. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, balanced accuracy, F1 score, and other relevant metrics.
The combined model integrating clinical features and IntraPeri_1mm radiomic features achieved the best overall performance. It demonstrated robust discriminative performance, with AUCs of 0.975 (95% CI, 0.945-1.000) in the training set, 0.854 (95% CI, 0.717-0.991) in the internal test set, and 0.795 (95% CI, 0.694-0.895) in the external validation set. SHAP analysis identified the core predictive feature. This feature correlated positively with high GS and showed significant yet weak correlations with aggressive clinical-radiological indicators. Mediation analysis revealed that this feature partially mediated the relationship between PI-RADS score and GS (indirect effect = 0.309, 95% CI, 0.061-0.875).
The interpretable machine learning model demonstrates excellent performance in predicting PCa grading.

PMID:
42401511
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.