Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Exploring the Effectiveness of Practice Development Interventions on Patient and Staff Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Created on 05 Jul 2026

Authors

Hazel A Smith, Vanda Carter, Charlotte Phillips, Yetunde Ataiyero, Alisen Dube, Joanne Odell, Callum Latham, Sally Hardy, Alison Leary, Sarahjane Jones

Published in

Journal of advanced nursing. Jul 04, 2026. Epub Jul 04, 2026.

Abstract

To explore Practice Development interventions and associated contextual factors to understand their impact on patient and staff outcomes and experiences in healthcare settings.
Systematic review.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis informed design, conduct and management. A systematic approach was taken, utilising multiple reviewers and consensus methods. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool informed quality appraisal. Qualitative findings were analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Quantitative results are presented as a narrative summary.
CINAHL; MEDLINE; PubMed; Scopus; ScienceDirect; Nursing and Allied Health; Cochrane Library; Internurse.com; The Kings Fund; GOV.UK and Trip Database were searched between 1st January 1980 to 5th January 2026.
Twenty-nine studies were included. Eighteen studies met all quality assessment criteria. Limited quantitative data was available, and inconsistent outcome measures constrained quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis generated three themes: (1) Shaping Practice: the interplay of organisational context, culture, and structure, (2) Enablers and constraints in Practice Development, (3) Collective empowerment.
Across diverse study designs, the majority of studies indicate that PD contributes positively to staff working environments and the contexts in which patient care is delivered. However, current findings do not demonstrate consistent improvements in clinical outcomes or quality of life.
Practice Development may contribute to improvements in care environments for patients and staff, respectively. This review highlights knowledge gaps in the generalisability and transferability of Practice Development that would benefit from further exploration.
Practice Development may enhance healthcare environments, but further research is needed to determine if these benefits impact upon clinical outcomes.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.
No patient or public contribution.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024557949.

PMID:
42401994
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 0
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement