Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

The interaction effects of flight distance, scheduling and contextual factors on basketball performance.

Created on 05 Jul 2026

Authors

Xi Zhang, Mingjia Qiu, Rui Dong, Bufan Wei, Mingxin Zhang

Published in

Journal of sports sciences. Pages 1-12. Jul 05, 2026. Epub Jul 05, 2026.

Abstract

This study examined how flight distance, scheduling factors, and team quality gap are associated with professional basketball performance. Data from 520 games in the China Basketball Association were analyzed. Flight distances were classified as short-haul (1079 ± 252 km), medium-haul (1830 ± 222 km), and long-haul (3163 ± 447 km), with home-away sequencing and landing-to-game intervals also considered as schedule-related contextual factors. Principal component analysis identified three performance dimensions: offensive performance (38.2% variance explained), defensive control (18.7%), and game rhythm & free-throw performance (8.9%). Linear mixed-effects models showed that offensive performance was consistently associated with team quality gap across all travel distances (all p < 0.001). Under medium-haul travel, home-to-away transitions were associated with reduced defensive control (β =  -1.303, p = 0.031), an effect attenuated by longer landing-to-game intervals (β = 0.040, p = 0.013). Under long-haul conditions, consecutive away games and shorter preparation intervals were linked to poorer rhythm and free-throw performance, whereas longer preparation time moderated these effects. Overall, travel-related contextual factors were differentially associated with distinct performance dimensions, emphasizing the need to jointly consider travel distance, home-away sequencing, and preparation intervals when interpreting performance variation in professional basketball.

PMID:
42402083
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 05 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement