Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cooperative Effects in the Inverse Coordination Complexes of Aromatic Azines and Tin(IV) Halides.

Created on 06 Jul 2026

Authors

Piotr Matczak

Published in

The journal of physical chemistry. A. Jul 05, 2026. Epub Jul 05, 2026.

Abstract

In this work, a series of model inverse coordination complexes composed of one aromatic azine molecule (pyrimidine, pyrazine, 1,2,4-triazine, 1,3,5-triazine, and 1,2,4,5-tetrazine) and two SnX4 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) molecules has been investigated using quantum chemical calculations. These 1:2 complexes demonstrate a rare structural motif─as evidenced by the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD)─in which a single "naked" azine center forms two N→Sn coordinate bonds simultaneously. Calculations reveal that the two bonds influence one another and, consequently, the 1:2 complexes exhibit longer N→Sn bonds and weaker interactions between the azine and SnX4 fragments than the corresponding 1:1 conventional complexes. Thus, the studied inverse coordination complexes are characterized by negative cooperative effects (or anticooperativity) between their N→Sn bonds. This conclusion is supported by an occurrence of the destabilizing three-body nonadditive contribution to the total interaction energy calculated at the CCSD(T)/CBS level of theory. The origin of the anticooperativity has been unveiled by the analysis of electron charge distribution and the fundamental physical nature of individual many-body contributions to the total interaction energy. Overall, this work shows how cooperative effects, together with the proper choice of azine center, can modulate the strength of N→Sn bonds in tin(IV) inverse coordination complexes.

PMID:
42402215
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement