Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Large language models as data-driven engines for benchmarking preventive and clinical knowledge in Chinese dental examinations.

Created on 06 Jul 2026

Authors

Yong Zeng, Xinyi Hu, Wei Liu, Ke Deng, Meiqin Zhou, Yao Wang, Ling Ma, Qi Liu, He Meng

Published in

Frontiers in oral health. Volume 7. Pages 1849721. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Digital and data-driven technologies are increasingly shaping preventive oral healthcare and dental education. While prior studies have explored large language model (LLM) performance in non-English examination settings, their role in benchmarking standardized clinical knowledge against real student performance under identical institutional conditions remains insufficiently examined.
This study evaluated GPT-4o, GPT-4.5, and DeepSeek-R1 using 300 standardized dental competency items from institutional examinations (2023-2025). Model performance was benchmarked against data from a real student cohort who completed the same examinations, and intra-model consistency was assessed across multiple independent trials.
DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest overall accuracy (92.33%), significantly outperforming GPT-4.5 and GPT-4o in 2023 and 2024, while showing comparable performance to GPT-4.5 in 2025. Model type was the predominant factor associated with accuracy differences, whereas knowledge domain did not significantly affect results. DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4.5 also demonstrated greater response consistency than GPT-4o.
These findings suggest that optimized LLMs demonstrate strong alignment with standardized examination criteria and student performance patterns, supporting their potential role as supplementary tools for curriculum evaluation in preventive dental education. Caution is warranted in generalizing these results beyond the single-institutional, text-only, Mandarin-language context.

PMID:
42405336
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement