How Does the Anterior Maxillary Arch Change After Unilateral Lip Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors

Tran Duc Ky Truong, Tien Thi Trieu Truong, Phuong Hoai Lam, Chon Thanh Ho Nguyen, Tuan Van Nguyen

Published in

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. Volume 63. Issue 8. Pages 2565-2577. Epub Oct 14, 2025.

Abstract

ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify morphological changes in the anterior maxillary arch-specifically anterior cleft width (CW) and anterior curvature angle (ACA)-following primary lip repair in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, DOAJ, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through January 2025. Eligible studies reported quantitative pre- and post-operative data on anterior arch morphology. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model with the Knapp-Hartung adjustment. Meta-regression assessed the influence of baseline cleft width and follow-up duration.ResultsTen studies comprising 11 patient cohorts and 265 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled mean difference in anterior CW) was -6.217 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): -7.230 to -5.204; P < .001), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 81.8%). Meta-regression identified initial cleft width as a significant predictor (β = -0.842; P = .002), and follow-up duration showed a borderline association (β = -0.387; P = .051). The predictive equation was: CW(change) = 4.465 - 0.842 × initial width - 0.387 × duration. Lip repair also reduced the anterior curvature angle (MD = -14.66°; 95% CI: -19.62 to -9.7), though heterogeneity was very high (I² = 88.1%).ConclusionPrimary lip repair significantly improves anterior arch dimensions in children with UCLP. Initial cleft width predicts postoperative changes, and the proposed model may support early treatment planning. However, due to substantial heterogeneity across studies, small sample sizes in some included cohorts, and very low certainty of evidence for both outcomes (GRADE approach), the findings should be interpreted with caution and considered exploratory.

PMID:
42406085
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 06 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.