Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Agreement, Compliance, and Practice Change of the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: A Nationwide Multidisciplinary Survey.

Created on 07 Jul 2026

Authors

In-Ho Kim, Tae-Han Kim, Bang Wool Eom, Seung Joo Kang, Byung-Hoon Min, Wonyoung Choi, Hye Sook Han

Published in

Journal of gastric cancer. Volume 26. Issue 3. Pages 311-322.

Abstract

The Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022 were developed using a rigorous, multidisciplinary, and evidence-based approach. However, their real-world acceptance and implementation have not yet been formally evaluated. This study assessed agreement, compliance, and practice changes associated with strong guideline recommendation statements.
A nationwide anonymous survey was conducted between August and November 2025 among specialists involved in gastric cancer care. Of the 40 recommendation statements addressing the 33 key questions, 18 strong recommendations were evaluated. Respondents rated agreement, compliance, and practice change using a 5-point Likert scale and provided quantitative estimates of compliance and practice change rates.
A total of 103 physicians participated, and 100 specialists were included in the main analyses. Most respondents worked at tertiary hospitals (72.8%), and 61.2% had more than 10 years of experience in gastric cancer care. Overall, 93.2% agreed that the guidelines were high-quality, evidence-based documents, and 80.6% reported that they were highly useful in clinical practice. Across the 18 strong recommendation statements, qualitative agreement ranged from 78.5% to 100%, compliance from 60.0% to 100%, and reported practice changes from 11.4% to 40.9%. On average, 95.9% agreed with the recommendations, 92.1% reported compliance, and 23.2% reported a practice change. In the quantitative assessment, the mean compliance rate was 89.7%, and the mean practice change rate was 14.3%.
The guidelines showed high agreement and compliance among the multidisciplinary specialists. Although changes in practice were relatively limited, the guidelines contributed to selected clinical improvements and promoted the standardization of evidence-based practices.

PMID:
42411160
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement