Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Deciphering the origin of the 13C NMR anomaly in cyclic ketones.

Created on 07 Jul 2026

Authors

Binod Kumar Oram, Saiprakash Rout, Akshay Kumar Sahu, Himansu S Biswal

Published in

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP. Jul 07, 2026. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

The 13C NMR chemical shielding of cyclic ketones presents a long-standing spectroscopic paradox: cyclopentanone (5-CK) exhibits the most deshielded carbonyl resonance, breaking the monotonic trend predicted by classical hybridization models, ring strain theories, and partial atomic charges. While high-resolution FTIR spectra (fundamental, 1st, and 2nd overtones), force constant analysis, and experimental CO bond dissociation energies confirm a monotonic weakening of the CO bond as ring size increases, the 13C NMR chemical shift follows a non-linear trend. Through a combination of spectroscopy and Natural Chemical Shielding (NCS) analysis, we reconciled this dichotomy. It was demonstrated that the 'cyclopentanone anomaly' is not a direct result of ground-state bond strain or %s-character redistribution (Bent's Rule) but is instead driven by a maximal paramagnetic orbital contribution. Specifically, the σ33 principal component of the shielding tensor, oriented perpendicular to the σ-bond of CO is identified as the primary contributor to deshielding. It reaches a maximum in the five-membered ring due to optimized magnetic-field-induced mixing of the oxygen lone pairs and the π* orbitals. This study provides a definitive resolution to a decades-old puzzle, shifting the conceptual framework for interpreting NMR shifts in strained systems from simple ground-state models to a rigorous analysis of paramagnetic shielding tensors.

PMID:
42411288
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement