Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Crown roots dominate nitrate uptake in maize (Zea mays L.) under varying soil moisture conditions.

Created on 07 Jul 2026

Authors

Yutong Jiang, Joann K Whalen

Published in

Annals of botany. Jul 07, 2026. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

Nitrate (NO3-) uptake is primarily driven by soil water flow and varies among maize root types. This study quantified NO3- uptake by embryonic (primary and seminal) and crown roots under contrasting soil water conditions to determine their relative contributions to total plant N acquisition during early vegetative growth.
Maize was grown in a split-root pot that segregated the embryonic and crown roots. The sandy-loam soil was moistened to water potentials of either -5 kPa (wet) or -30 kPa (relatively dry). A partial N mass balance was made by destructively sampling shoots, roots, and soils after 0, 24, and 48 h following 15N-KNO3 injection at the V3 (three-leaf) and V6 (six-leaf) stages. Root hydraulic conductance was quantified using an osmotic-driven root exudation method. Gross nitrification was assessed using a 15N isotope dilution technique.
At the V3 stage, crown roots had 202% more N uptake than embryonic roots in wet soil (-5 kPa). However, in relatively dry soil (-30 kPa), N uptake was similar for embryonic and crown roots, and crown root hydraulic conductance was 80% lower than in wet soil. By the V6 stage, crown roots dominated N uptake, with embryonic roots supplying < 20% of N uptake. Gross nitrification rates did not differ significantly between root types.
Maize NO3- uptake depends primarily on the crown roots, due to their capacity to extract water and NO3- from soil, even under dry conditions.

PMID:
42411304
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement