National study to characterize teletrauma use in United States emergency departments.

Authors

Zain G Hashmi, Janice A Espinola, Ashley F Sullivan, Krislyn M Boggs, Maeve Swanton, Russell Griffin, Jan O Jansen, Jeffrey D Kerby, Carlos A Camargo

Published in

Journal of telemedicine and telecare. Pages 1357633X261462011. Jul 07, 2026. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

BackgroundEmergency department (ED)-based teletrauma service may improve access to trauma expertise, especially in rural areas. However, its impact on patient outcomes remains unclear due to limited understanding of how and what type of care is delivered. The objective of this study was to characterize how EDs in the United States (US) use teletrauma services in clinical practice.MethodsNon-federal/non-specialty EDs, that previously reported using teletrauma, were surveyed in the 2023 National Emergency Department Inventory Teletrauma Survey. The survey was developed and mailed/emailed to ED directors up to two times; nonresponders were contacted via telephone. Survey assessed structural and process measures including staffing, workflows, clinical care, and resource availability. Descriptive statistics were used.ResultsAmong 378 EDs that reported using teletrauma in 2022, 310 responded (82%). Only 68% (211/310) reported using teletrauma in 2023. Most teletrauma-using EDs (TT-EDs) used the service once a month or less (58%), were staffed by non-emergency medicine (EM)-trained providers for in-person care (69%) and EM-trained physicians for remote care (72%). Consults were usually initiated at the discretion of the in-person provider (80%) and often after the patient's arrival to the ED (46%). Clinical applications included decision-support for interfacility transfers (78%), resuscitation-support (71%), documentation (69%) and remote procedural-support (64%) for patients of all ages. Some TT-EDs received trauma education from teletrauma-providing sites (30%), but few reported receiving resources, such as blood products (4%).ConclusionTeletrauma is not widely used in US EDs. Even when capabilities exist, teletrauma use remains limited and insufficiently adapted to rural trauma care.

PMID:
42412038
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 07 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.