Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

NoisyFlow: differentially private optimal transport using neural networks for secure biomedical data sharing across multiple institutions.

Created on 08 Jul 2026

Authors

Yunyang Li, Nikhil Khandekar, Skylar Wang, Varada Khanna, Julian Sanker, Mark B Gerstein

Published in

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). Volume 42. Issue Supplement_1. Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

Biomedical models improve when trained on data pooled across institutions, but sensitive patient records (e.g. genomics, clinical data, and medical images) are difficult to share due to privacy constraints. Moreover, data collected at different sites often have shifted distributions because of covariate differences (including batch effects), so privacy-preserving sharing alone cannot simply resolve cross-site mismatch. Methods that protect individuals while explicitly aligning distributions are needed to enable reliable multi-institutional analyses.
We present NoisyFlow, a three-stage differentially private framework for cross-institutional harmonization under distribution shift. In stage I, each site learns a differentially private flow-based generator of its local labeled distribution. In stage II, it learns a neural optimal transport map to a shared reference distribution. In stage III, a central server composes the released models to generate reference-aligned pseudo-data for downstream analysis without accessing raw records. Across four biomedical settings spanning single-cell genomics, histopathology, neurogenomics, and wearable sensing, NoisyFlow reduces distribution shift while preserving downstream utility under formal differential privacy guarantees.
The implementation of NoisyFlow is available at https://github.com/gersteinlab/NoisyFlow.

PMID:
42412817
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement