Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Pollution removal efficiency enhancement by agricultural biomass additions in constructed wetlands: A framework integrating meta-analysis with explainable machine learning.

Created on 08 Jul 2026

Authors

Wenjie Li, Jian Wang, Xinya Liu, Yulin Zhuang, Hongda Fang, Jinliang Huang

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 7. Pages e0353064. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

The agricultural biomass addition on constructed wetlands (CWs) is a sustainable strategy that integrates pollution control with waste valorization. However, their widespread applications remain constrained by variations in biomass types, pretreatments, and system designs. This study combined meta-analysis and explainable machine learning to assess how agricultural biomass addition influences Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Total Nitrogen (TN) removal in CWs, particularly under low C/N conditions, using 272 and 1,283 independent observations for meta-analysis and machine learning, respectively. Results showed that bamboo biochar significantly enhances COD removal efficiency in CWs by an average of 54.8% (SMD = 2.50), while lotus leaf biochar improves TN removal efficiency by 32.5% (SMD = 1.20) compared with controls. Additionally, multiple machine learning models were tested and the results showed that the XGBoost model demonstrated the robustperformance in simulating TN removal (R2 = 0.83), whereas the Random Forest model is effective for COD removal (R2 = 0.76). SHAP analysis further indicatedthat increasing wetland volume can simultaneously enhance both COD and TN removal efficiencies. This study underscores the power of combining meta-analysis and explainable machine learning to optimize CW design and management, offering a robust framework for improving pollution removal in CWs.

PMID:
42412895
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement