Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Interpretation of Appropriate Range of Body Mass Index and Body Weight Management Standards for the Oldest Old: Evidence-based Recommendations from China.

Created on 08 Jul 2026

Authors

Xiao Yan Ma, Pei Liang Chen, Chen Chen, Xi Meng, Jin Hui Zhou, Shi Hao Lou, Jian Zhang, Yao He, Li Qi, Wen Hua Zhao, Yue Bin Lyu, Chen Mao, Xiao Ming Shi

Published in

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES. Volume 39. Issue 6. Pages 703-710. Jun 20, 2026.

Abstract

With the rapid aging of China's population, the number of adults aged ≥ 80 years is rising, and their nutritional status and weight management have attracted growing attention. Body mass index (BMI) is a commonly used indicator for assessing body weight and nutritional status. However, existing BMI standards were mainly developed for the general adult population, and their applicability to the oldest old population remains uncertain. To provide guidance for BMI evaluation and weight management among the oldest old population in China, the National Health Commission issued the standard " Appropriate body mass index range and weight management standards for the oldest old (WS/T 868-2025)". Based on evidence from prospective cohort studies including the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey and the Healthy Aging and Biomarkers Cohort Study, the standard recommends an appropriate BMI range of 22.0-26.9 kg/m 2 for adults aged ≥ 80 years and provides recommendations regarding BMI measurement, weight monitoring, and individualized weight management. The implementation of this standard provides scientific evidence for weight evaluation and health management in the oldest old population and contributes to promoting healthy aging.

PMID:
42417238
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 08 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement