Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Impact of Pulse Field Ablation on Hemolysis Markers: A Single-Center Experience.

Created on 09 Jul 2026

Authors

Yong Hao Yeo, Nolan Shoukri, Chandramohan Meenakshisundaram, Ilana Kutinsky, Brian D Williamson, Nishaki K Mehta

Published in

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Jul 08, 2026. Epub Jul 08, 2026.

Abstract

Pulse field ablation (PFA) has gained attention as an alternative modality for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) due to its favorable safety profile compared with thermal ablation. However, hemolysis has emerged as a unique concern with PFA, yet the risk factors underlying its development and the extent to which it translates into renal complications remain poorly defined.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent PFA at our health system between June 2024 and May 2025. Postprocedural hemolysis was assessed using plasma-free hemoglobin (Hb) levels, with patients stratified into high (> 30 mg/dL) and normal/low (≤ 30 mg/dL) groups. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and renal outcomes were compared between groups, and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors associated with hemolysis.
A total of 232 patients (FARAPULSE [Manufacturer 1 PFA system] in 173 patients [74.6%]; PulseSelect [Manufacturer 2 system] in 59 patients [25.4%]) underwent PFA (mean age 67.5 ± 9.6, 34.1% female), of whom 109 (47.0%) developed high postprocedural plasma-free Hb (> 30 mg/dL). Baseline demographics were similar between groups, but patients with high free Hb were more often treated with the Manufacturer 1 PFA system (91.7% vs. 59.3%, p < 0.01), underwent PVI with additional ablation (73.4% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.01), and received a greater number of applications (63.2 ± 14.9 vs. 51.1 ± 11.5, p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, independent risk factors associated with hemolysis included use of the Manufacturer 1 system (aOR 6.67, 95% CI 2.94-16.47), total applications > 59 (aOR 4.25, 95% CI 2.04-9.19), and higher preprocedural hemoglobin level (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.19-1.97). The rate of AKI was low and similar between the two groups (0.9% vs. 0.8%, p = 1.00). None of the patients required renal replacement therapy.
Our real-world study, following the commercial approval of PFA systems, showed that 47% of patients developed subclinical hemolysis after PFA, with no actionable clinical outcomes.

PMID:
42418818
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement