Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cleaning Efficacy of Air Polishing on Tobacco-Stained Resin Composite: An In-Vitro Study.

Created on 09 Jul 2026

Authors

Lukas Sigwart, Vera Wiesmüller, Ines Kapferer-Seebacher

Published in

Clinical and experimental dental research. Volume 12. Issue 4. Pages e70406.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of air-polishing on color change and surface roughness of resin composite and enamel specimens after standardized cigarette smoke exposure.
Sixty composite/enamel specimens were exposed daily to cigarette smoke in an automated chamber over four 14-day cycles (five cigarettes/day). After each cycle, specimens were cleaned using air-polishing with erythritol or sodium bicarbonate powder, or a rubber cup and pumice (control). Color changes (ΔE) were assessed spectrophotometrically, and surface roughness was measured profilometrically before and after each cycle.
All cleaning methods significantly reduced tobacco staining on composite and enamel; however, none restored the original color. After four cycles, median [IQR] ΔE values for resin composites did not differ significantly among groups (erythritol: 26.17 [21.62-27.52]; sodium bicarbonate: 10.28 [7.44-27.77]; control: 24.56 [19.22-26.77]; p > 0.05). Surface roughness increased significantly in all groups, with the greatest increase following sodium bicarbonate air-polishing (p < 0.05). Luting gap roughness increased significantly with sodium bicarbonate in comparison with erythritol and the control group (p < 0.001). Repeated air-polishing did not promote further tobacco stain accumulation.
Erythritol air-polishing effectively reduced discoloration with minimal surface alteration, whereas sodium bicarbonate caused significant roughening.
Cigarette smoke causes clinically perceptible composite discoloration that cannot be completely eliminated. Erythritol represents a safer polishing option than sodium bicarbonate.

PMID:
42418813
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement