Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Differences in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake according to region of birth: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Sweden.

Created on 09 Jul 2026

Authors

Mariam Hassan, Adam Mitchell, Malin Inghammar, Jonas Björk, Louise Bennet

Published in

Frontiers in public health. Volume 14. Pages 1861648. Epub Jun 24, 2026.

Abstract

High vaccine uptake was crucial in preventing morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study aimed to investigate barriers and drivers of vaccination in Sweden across birth region groups with varying COVID-19 vaccine uptake.
A cross-sectional anonymous survey was distributed non-randomly among individuals born in Sweden and immigrants from Western and non-Western countries (n = 3,281). Six domains, 'trust in vaccines', 'benefit-risk balance', 'trust in institutions', 'injunctive norms', 'descriptive norms', and 'accessibility' were generated, with vaccine acceptance scores (range 1-5), and summary vaccine scores (range 6-30). Linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the associations between the summary acceptance score and vaccine uptake, overall and by region of birth. Associations between the specific domains and vaccine uptake were modelled using logistic regression (odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)), stratified by region of birth.
The associations between vaccine acceptance and uptake were generally strong, but weaker among individuals from non-Western countries. Vaccinated individuals from Sweden and Western countries had 9.5 (95% CI: 9.2-9.7) and 8.9 (95% CI: 8.1-9.7), respectively, higher average vaccine acceptance score than their unvaccinated counterparts, compared with only 2.8 (95% CI: 2.0-3.6) higher average score among vaccinated individuals from non-Western countries. Among individuals from Sweden and Western countries, 'descriptive norms' (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 2.0-3.4; and OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.5-8.7, respectively) and 'trust in vaccines' (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.9-3.2; and OR = 4.2; 95% CI: 2.0-8.8, respectively) had the strongest associations with vaccine uptake. Among individuals from non-Western countries, associations with vaccine uptake were only observed for 'trust in vaccines' (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3) and 'benefit-risk balance' (OR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2-2.4).
There were significant differences across region groups in the impact of BeSD factors on vaccination. The weaker associations observed among individuals from non-Western countries suggest that these factors may not explain vaccine uptake in this group, where vaccine acceptance was moderately high regardless of vaccination status.

PMID:
42422674
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement