Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Identifying populations with faster cognitive decline using blood-based biomarkers.

Created on 09 Jul 2026

Authors

James Russell Pike, Yongmei Liu, Theresa Chisolm, Jennifer Deal, Jingzhong Ding, Rebecca F Gottesman, Alison Huang, Timothy M Hughes, Kurt Lohman, Mason McCray, Thomas H Mosley, Anh Tram Nguyen, Priya Palta, Nicholas Reed, Kevin J Sullivan, Bharat Thyagarajan, Keenan A Walker, Josef Coresh

Published in

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). Volume 12. Issue 3. Pages e70289. Epub Jul 08, 2026.

Abstract

Identifying individuals who undergo cognitive decline is vital to the success of prevention trials that aim to slow cognitive decline. Yet, the benefits of using blood-based biomarkers of neurodegeneration, as well as amyloid and tau, to enrich population-based prevention trials have not been quantified.
The association of thresholds of Quanterix single molecule array (SiMoA) assays with subsequent change in cognition was estimated in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort (N = 1826) using linear mixed effects models, validated in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort (N = 383), and extended to Alamar Nucleic acid Linked Immuno-Sandwich Assay (NULISA) assays in the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders cohort (N = 552).
Elevated plasma biomarker levels identified dementia-free older adults with faster cognitive decline. By selecting participants with Quanterix SiMoA measurements of neurofilament light > 30.65 pg/mL, the sample size needed to detect a 33% reduction in cognitive decline in a clinical trial decreased by 57%.
Clinical trials can use plasma biomarkers as a screening tool to increase statistical power.

PMID:
42421822
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement