Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Molecular and Treatment-Associated Correlates of Survival in Glioblastoma: Complementary Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and The Cancer Genome Atlas-Glioblastoma (TCGA-GBM) Cohort Analyses.

Created on 09 Jul 2026

Authors

Kevin Woodson

Published in

Cureus. Volume 18. Issue 7. Pages e112222. Epub Jul 07, 2026.

Abstract

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) carries a poor prognosis. We evaluated population-level and tumor-level determinants of survival in parallel Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and The Cancer Genome Atlas-Glioblastoma (TCGA-GBM) cohorts. Methods SEER cases (histology 9440/3, 2000-2022) were stratified by diagnosis era and registry-recorded trimodality therapy. TCGA-GBM IDH-wildtype cases were analyzed by MGMT promoter methylation status. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and multivariable Cox models were applied. Results SEER included 53,432 cases (48,715 deaths), and TCGA IDH-wildtype included 512 cases. Median overall survival (OS) rose modestly across eras (7.0, 9.0, 10.0 months) and remained independently associated with survival after adjustment. Recorded trimodality therapy was associated with longer median OS (14.0 vs 4.0 months). In TCGA, median OS was 15.7 vs 12.5 months for MGMT-methylated vs unmethylated GBM (p=0.012), but MGMT methylation was not significant after multivariable adjustment (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.63-1.08, p=0.162). Conclusions Era-associated survival gains persisted after adjustment, suggesting that multimodality therapy uptake explains only part of population-level improvements. MGMT methylation predicted unadjusted but not adjusted survival in IDH-wildtype GBM, consistent with known age confounding.

PMID:
42421802
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 09 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement