Assessing the appropriateness of helicopter emergency medical services for non-traumatic emergencies in a medically underserved rural area, Japan.

Authors

Shohei Matsubara, Ken-Ei Sada, Masataka Kudo, Sho Sasaki, Atsushi Morizane, Koshi Kajihara, Hidenao Okubo, Kosuke Hamagawa, Toshimi Mizobuchi, Toshikazu Yabe, Yuichi Saisaka, Kimiaki Tanaka, Narufumi Suganuma

Published in

PloS one. Volume 21. Issue 7. Pages e0353451. Epub Jul 09, 2026.

Abstract

Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are essential in trauma care, but their role in non-traumatic emergencies remains unclear, particularly in medically underserved rural areas where long total prehospital times and limited specialty care access complicate emergency response.
To evaluate the appropriateness of HEMS dispatches in non-trauma emergencies by assessing undertriage and overtriage based on clinical necessity and total prehospital time in rural western Kochi Prefecture, Japan.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) requiring emergency transport for moderate to severe non-traumatic conditions during HEMS operational hours from 2017 to 2021. HEMS necessity was classified as "absolute" (treatment unavailable at local core hospitals) or "relative" (critical condition benefiting from shorter transport). Appropriateness was defined as concordance between actual transport modality and predefined necessity criteria, with undertriage and overtriage determined by comparing the actual primary HEMS dispatch requests against these criteria and regional total prehospital times.
Of the 2,312 eligible patients, 63 received primary HEMS dispatches and 2,249 ground EMS (GEMS). Among HEMS dispatches, 56 of 63 (88.9%) were overtriaged, while seven (11.1%) were appropriately triaged. Among GEMS transports, 248 of 2,249 (11.0%) retrospectively met HEMS criteria, yielding an 11.0% undertriage rate. Overtriaged cases included patients lacking relative necessity criteria or total prehospital time advantage.
In medically underserved rural regions, clinical severity alone may be insufficient for determining HEMS necessity in non-traumatic emergencies. Incorporating total prehospital time advantage and regional infrastructure consideration may refine dispatch decision-making and improve HEMS utilization appropriateness.

PMID:
42424367
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.