Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Efficacy of Modified Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Intrafascial Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postoperative Urinary Continence Recovery.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Huan Cheng, Zjin Wan, Jingyang Liang, Haosen Lu, Yue Zhou, Lijun Mao

Published in

APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Volume 134. Issue 7. Pages e70233.

Abstract

This study was designed to expound the efficacy of a modified extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) technique involving total intrafascial resection with the standard interfascial nerve-sparing technique in patients with prostate cancer (PC), and to identify factors influencing postoperative urinary continence recovery following the modified procedure. Phase 1: A retrospective analysis compared modified (n = 100) vs. standard ELRP (n = 100) for surgical outcomes, urodynamics, erectile function, and continence recovery. Phase 2: Analysis of 400 modified ELRP patients identified independent continence recovery risk factors via logistic regression (poor-continence: n = 63; good-continence: n = 337). At 6 months, the modified group showed greater urodynamic improvement (p < 0.05). Erectile function and continence were comparable at 1/3 months but better in the modified group at 6 months (p < 0.05). Age ≥ 65 years, BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m2, TURP history, prostate volume ≥ 30 cm3, preserved urethral length ≤ 5 cm, and absence of regular pelvic floor exercises were associated with postoperative continence recovery in PC patients (p < 0.05). Modified ELRP provides favorable oncological and functional outcomes in PC patients. Several patient- and surgery-related factors were associated with postoperative urinary continence recovery.

PMID:
42425916
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement