Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Systematic Review of the Characterization of Behavior in Canine Behavioral Questionnaires.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Johnson A, Schenke K, Foster J, Stephens-Lewis D

Published in

Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS. Pages 1-47. Jul 09, 2026. Epub Jul 09, 2026.

Abstract

Whilst many questionnaires assessing canine behavior exist, characterizations of behavior are inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review identified how existing canine behavioral questionnaires characterize dog behavior. Completed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, Study characteristics and eligible questionnaires were extracted for synthesis. Based on previous literature, a behavioral characterization framework was developed consisting of: Temperament, Emotion, Literal behavior related to composition, Literal behavior resulting from learning, Literal behavior - other, and Other. Thirty-eight studies reporting 37 questionnaires were included. Item coding revealed substantial variability in how canine behavior was operationalized, with emotion-based descriptors ranging from 2.3% - 40.5% across groups, and a high proportion of mixed or uncategorizable items (26.3% - 64.4%), indicating conflation of observable behavior with inferred traits or emotional states. This review highlights inconsistency in how canine behavior is defined and measured, with many existing questionnaires conflating observable behavior with inferred traits or emotions. The findings emphasize the need for a clearer conceptualization of "canine behaviour" and development of tools that capture literal, observable actions rather than human interpretation.

PMID:
42425940
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement