Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Associations between physical activity, physical fitness, and body composition in adults living in Germany: a cross-sectional replication study.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Raphael Schilling, Janis Fiedler, Janina Krell-Roesch, Alexander Woll, Steffen C E Schmidt

Published in

Scientific reports. Volume 16. Issue 1. Jul 09, 2026. Epub Jul 09, 2026.

Abstract

Previous work showed that physical fitness (PF) is more strongly related to body composition (BC) than self-reported physical activity (PA) in adults. In this study, we provide post-COVID BC statistics and evaluate the reproducibility of previously observed associations between PA, PF, and BC. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 320 adults aged 34-82 years collected in 2025 and compared them with data from 2021. PA was assessed using a validated questionnaire. PF was measured through a standardized performance test battery and BC was obtained via bioelectrical impedance analysis. Associations between PA, PF, and BC were analyzed using sex-specific linear regression models. No significant differences in BC were found between 2021 and 2025. Participants had higher PA and muscular strength but lower coordination in 2025 compared to 2021. PF showed stronger associations with BC than PA. Muscular strength remained the most important predictor of BC and showed the strongest association with phase angle (males: β = 0.40, p < .001; females: β = 0.31, p = .002). The consistency of these associations across two independent samples from 2021 to 2025 indicates a robust pattern under different societal conditions and highlights the importance of PF for supporting healthy aging with regard to BC.

PMID:
42426330
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement