Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Dan Wang, Wei Liu, Lingli Zheng, Yan Li, Ting Jiang, Jing Li

Published in

Frontiers in pharmacology. Volume 17. Pages 1788293. Epub Jun 25, 2026.

Abstract

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a severe complication of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is increasingly detected due to improved diagnostics. Intrathecal therapy, which involves delivering drugs directly into the subarachnoid space, has become a key treatment approach. A variety of cytotoxic drugs, targeted therapies, immune-checkpoint inhibitors, and combination treatments are now available through different intrathecal protocols, offering new hope to patients.
Extensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, CNKI, and VIP. Data collected included histological subtype, intrathecal delivery method, treatment regimen, median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) in ≥10% of patients.
Twelve clinical studies with 544 patients (average age 53.27 years) met the criteria. Drug delivery was via lumbar puncture or Ommaya reservoir. Objective response rates were 34.5%-86.4%, and disease control rates were 62.5%-94.9%. Three trials reported progression-free survival of 3.5, 6.3, and 9.6 months, with overall survival from 3.66 to 17 months. AEs in over 10% of patients included myelosuppression, gastrointestinal issues, and neurological symptoms.
Intrathecal therapy offers significant clinical benefits, especially when combined with other treatments, with a manageable toxicity profile.

PMID:
42428504
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement