Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Considerations on the risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing transformation events stacked by conventional crossing.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Josep Casacuberta, Francisco Barro, Albert Braeuning, Ruud de Maagd, Michelle M Epstein, Thomas Frenzel, Jean-Luc Gallois, Frits Koning, Antoine Messéan, F Javier Moreno, Fabien Nogué, Giovanni Savoini, Alan H Schulman, Christoph Tebbe, Eve Veromann, Giacomo De Sanctis, Antonio Fernandez Dumont, Dafni Kagkli, Sara Jacchia, Franco Maria Neri, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Tommaso Raffaello, Reinhilde Schoonjans

Published in

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority. Volume 24. Issue 7. Pages e10177. Epub Jul 09, 2026.

Abstract

Following a mandate from EFSA, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) addressed the food and feed risk assessment of genetically modified plants containing stacked transformation events ('stacks'). The GMO Panel examined the experience gained in the assessment of stacks in the last 20 years. Based on this, the GMO Panel concluded that under specific conditions, field trials for comparative analysis may not always be required for the assessment of stacks and a derogation may be considered. The conditions are: all the events combined in the stack should express traits through newly expressed proteins (NEPs) and these should not be metabolic modifiers. Under the same conditions and in the absence of interactions affecting NEP expression levels, a derogation from current requirements for dietary exposure assessment may also be considered. The GMO Panel also proposes improvements for applicants regarding the presentation of molecular characterisation data for stacks.

PMID:
42428973
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement