Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

p16/Ki-67 dual-stain immunocytochemistry in precision cervical cancer prevention: immunoprofile and clinical decision-making.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Martyna Trzeszcz, Robert Jach

Published in

Polish journal of pathology : official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists. Volume 77. Issue 2. Pages 195-202. Jun 25, 2026.

Abstract

Cervical cancer prevention has undergone a major shift with the implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening, which offers high sensitivity but limited specificity due to the detection of transient infections. This has created a need for triage methods capable of identifying infections associated with clinically meaningful disease. Primary HPV testing provides a high level of reassurance when negative; however, individuals with a positive result require additional evaluation using triage methods that effectively identify precancerous lesions while avoiding unnecessary colposcopy referrals. This review addresses the role of p16/Ki-67 dual-stain (DS) immunocytochemistry as a biomarker of transforming HPV infection, with a focus on HPV-based screening settings. We discuss its biological basis and diagnostic performance in comparison with cytology, with particular attention to the principles and practical aspects of DS interpretation in routine cytopathological practice. We also summarize current evidence, including data from national studies and routine clinical practice, demonstrating that DS can be effectively integrated into screening pathways and support more informed clinical decision-making. Its increasing use reflects the broader transition toward biologically informed cervical cancer prevention.

PMID:
42429429
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement