Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Associations of distinct sedentary behaviors with cortical, subcortical, and white matter hyperintensity volumes: Evidence from the ARIC study.

Created on 10 Jul 2026

Authors

Natan Feter, Anamika Nanda, Sarah Hourihan, Daniel Aslan, Jayne Feter, M Katherine Sayre, Pradyumna K Bharadwaj, Madeline Ally, Hyun Song, Amit Arora, Silvio Maltagliati, Mark H C Lai, Rand R Wilcox, Yann C Klimentidis, Gene E Alexander, David A Raichlen

Published in

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. Volume 22. Issue 7. Pages e71582.

Abstract

Longitudinal studies linking sedentary behavior (SB) in different contexts to brain structure and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume remain limited.
We analyzed data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (n = 1,712). Self-reported SB was assessed at visit 1 (1987-1989), with neuroimaging (3T magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) at visit 5 (2011-2013). Participants were non-demented adults (57% women; 53[5.2] years) who reported frequency of TV watching and occupational sitting. Outcomes included cortical, subcortical, and Alzheimer's disease-signature regions (ADSR), and total WMH brain volumes.
Frequent TV watching was associated with increased WMH volume and reduced frontal, occipital, and ADSR volumes. Sitting during work, which is more cognitively active, was linked to lower WMH and larger frontal (males only), occipital, and parietal volumes. Results remained consistent when adjusted for physical activity.
SB is associated with structural brain and WMH volumes. Cognitively active SB may preserve brain structure and cerebrovascular health.

PMID:
42429220
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 10 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement