Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Periodic shifts in viral load increase risk of Hendra virus spillover from Pteropus bats.

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Tamika J Lunn, Benny Borremans, Devin N Jones-Slobodian, Maureen K Kessler, Adrienne S Dale, Claude K Yinda, Manuel Ruiz-Aravena, Caylee A Falvo, Daniel E Crowley, James O Lloyd-Smith, Vincent J Munster, Peggy Eby, Hamish McCallum, Peter Hudson, Olivier Restif, Liam P McGuire, Ina L Smith, Bat One Health Group Collaborators, Raina K Plowright, Alison J Peel

Published in

Science advances. Volume 12. Issue 28. Pages eaea6654. Jul 10, 2026. Epub Jul 10, 2026.

Abstract

Prediction and management of zoonotic spillover requires an understanding of infection dynamics within reservoir host populations. Spillover risk is commonly inferred from infection prevalence based on detection of viral genomic material, yet detection alone does not indicate the presence of infectious virus or a sufficient dose for transmission. We undertook a comprehensive investigation of Hendra virus shedding in its primary reservoir, Pteropus bats, analyzing quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT-qPCR) data from 6151 pooled urine samples collected across five sites over 3 years. We assessed longitudinal associations between viral prevalence (proportion of positive pooled urine samples), viral load proxies, and equine spillover, using generalized additive models and a permutation analysis. Peak prevalence periods associated with spillover events (N = 5) had a higher proportion of samples with high viral loads than periods without spillover. Prolonged periods of low viral load and low prevalence likely reflect noninfectious RNA or doses insufficient for cross-species transmission. Incorporating viral load metrics alongside prevalence can improve prediction of spillover risk.

PMID:
42430468
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement