Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Neuroretinal damage associated with pituitary macroadenoma: endocrine and radiological predictors and correlation with optical coherence tomography-derived biomarkers.

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Diego Fernandez-Velasco, Elena Garcia-Martin, Belen Santamaria, María Jesús Rodrigo

Published in

Frontiers in endocrinology. Volume 17. Pages 1829465. Epub Jun 26, 2026.

Abstract

To identify endocrine and radiological tumor characteristics associated with higher risk of visual impairment.
A retrospective observational study included 40 patients with pituitary macroadenoma. Variables analyzed were age, sex, disease duration, treatment, hormonal profile, tumor volume, and ophthalmic parameters: visual acuity (VA), perimetry, and retinal analysis using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
Surgery normalized ACTH, cortisol, IGF-1, and prolactin levels. Larger tumor volumes were observed in males, nonfunctioning tumors, nonoperated patients, and relapses. Larger tumors were associated with worse visual field, while VA remained stable. OCT showed thinning of total retina and inner retinal layers in patients with disease duration >5 years, nonfunctioning tumors, larger tumors, postoperative status, and relapse (p < 0.05). Macular ganglion cell layer thickness correlated inversely with IGF-1 and prolactin, and retinal nerve fiber layer with tumor size. The inner nuclear layer exhibited a non-linear behavior, thickening in early stages while thinning in severe injury.
Hormonal and radiological factors are associated with visual dysfunction. OCT and perimetry detect early visual pathway damage better than VA. Non-linear behavior of the INL stand out as a potential prognostic biomarker.

PMID:
42434294
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement