Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Feasibility of pulsed field ablation for ventricular arrhythmia: a systematic review.

Created on 11 Jul 2026

Authors

Irnizarifka Irnizarifka, Christopher Daniel Tristan, Enrico Ananda Budiono, Matthew Aldo Wijayanto, Immanuel Soni Tanudjaya, Raymond Pranata, Mohammad Iqbal

Published in

Future cardiology. Pages 1-13. Jul 11, 2026. Epub Jul 11, 2026.

Abstract

Beyond its efficacy on atrial fibrillation, pulsed field ablation (PFA) presents potential advantages in ventricular arrhythmia. This study sought to investigate the feasibility of PFA for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC).
A systematic search (Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct) with citation searching was performed on 9 January 2026. Studies evaluating the feasibility of PFA in VT and PVC were included.
This study included seven studies (74 patients with VT and 86 with PVC). Pooled acute procedural success rate in VT was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.99) and in the PVC was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-1.00). During follow-up, VT recurrence rates ranged from 20% to 54%. PVC ablation demonstrated a significant burden reduction (MD: 86.54%; 95% CI: 59.21-113.86; p = 0.005) with long-term success rates ranging from 50% to 85%. Safety evaluation demonstrated satisfactory outcomes, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during follow-up occurring in four patients with high-risk comorbidity. Major adverse events (AEs) occurred in 11 patients and were preventable; minor AEs consisted solely of vascular access site AEs.
PFA was feasible for VT and PVC ablation. Larger long-term studies and standardized protocol were urgently necessary to ensure efficacy with minimal AEs.
www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420251272352.

PMID:
42434806
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 11 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement