Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Single-nucleus transcriptomics-based drug screening platform for focal cortical dysplasia.

Created on 12 Jul 2026

Authors

Chuantao Fang, Guilin Meng, Lin Yang, Lijun Wang, Yanfeng Tan, Jingjing Guo, Ying Shi, Xianming Liu, Rui Zhao, Min Zhang, Lei An, Fang Yuan, Dashi Qi

Published in

Molecular psychiatry. Jul 11, 2026. Epub Jul 11, 2026.

Abstract

Focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) are a major cause of drug-resistant epilepsy, yet their molecular and pathological complexity has limited the development of effective antiseizure medications. Here, we performed single-nucleus RNA sequencing on 49 human neocortical specimens spanning FCDI-III. We identified prominent transcriptional alterations in non-neuronal populations, particularly astrocytes and vascular cells, with signatures suggestive of endothelial and smooth muscle cell dysfunction. In contrast, neuronal populations exhibited additional subtype-specific heterogeneity. Notably, vascular-associated signatures were consistently observed across FCD subtypes, suggesting a convergent feature of diseased cortex. To systematically explore candidate interventions, we integrated cell-type-resolved transcriptional signatures with the Connectivity Map to prioritize compounds from ~40,000 perturbagens. This analysis yielded 20 candidates, among which four compounds (Betamethasone, Lodamin, Valproxam, and Licochalcone A) reduced seizure-like activity in vivo, as assessed by behavioral assays and local field potential recordings. These effects were further evaluated in an mTOR-driven FCD model. Collectively, our findings establish a transcriptome-guided framework for linking multicellular disease signatures to candidate therapeutic strategies in refractory epilepsy.

PMID:
42436259
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement