Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Perioperative factors limiting the discharge of patients treated with microvascular reconstruction after oral cancer resection.

Created on 12 Jul 2026

Authors

Christian Kaare Paaskesen, Jens Ahm Sørensen

Published in

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. Jun 09, 2026. Epub Jun 09, 2026.

Abstract

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols reduce length of stay (LOS) in patients with head and neck cancer, but outcomes remain variable in heterogeneous study populations. This retrospective cohort study investigates factors responsible for prolonged hospitalization after oral cancer resection and microvascular reconstruction. To enable targeted patient care and reduce LOS, we propose functional discharge criteria to be fulfilled before discharge.
Factors limiting the discharge of 95 patients were recorded on each postoperative day throughout hospitalization, to assess at what point a limiting factor remained unsolved. Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression were used to assess the association between demographic and surgical variables and LOS.
The mean LOS was 13.98 days, with common limiting factors for discharge being insufficient nutritional intake, tracheostomy, infection, immobilization, and ICU stay. Severity of complications and LOS was correlated (P < .001), but no correlation between comorbidities and LOS (P = .37) was found. The use of tracheostomy (P < .001) and ambulation after first postoperative day (P = .035) independently increased LOS.
The study recommends functional discharge criteria that include adequate nutrition, effective pain management, no suspected infections, tracheostomy closure, and normal bowel function. Early ambulation and a selective, individualized approach to tracheostomy are suggested to enhance outcomes.

PMID:
42436049
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement