Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Healthcare professionals' views on barriers to implementing evidence-based enteral nutrition management in ICU patients receiving prone position ventilation: a qualitative descriptive study.

Created on 12 Jul 2026

Authors

Zhenxiu Yu, Xiaomei Chang, Shenglin Hu, Guorong Li, Xueqin Li, Wenfeng Lu

Published in

BMC nursing. Jul 11, 2026. Epub Jul 11, 2026.

Abstract

To explore healthcare professionals' views on barriers to implementing evidence-based enteral nutrition management specifically in ICU patients receiving prone position ventilation, with particular focus on prone positioning-induced challenges distinct from general ICU enteral nutrition care.
A qualitative descriptive study.
The study was conducted in a general ICU of a tertiary comprehensive hospital in a city in Sichuan Province, China.
In 2025, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 participants, including 12 nurses and 3 physicians, all of whom had worked in the ICU for more than one year and had experience in providing enteral nutrition care for patients undergoing prone positioning ventilation. Participants were recruited using purposive sampling until data saturation was achieved. Interview questions specifically targeted prone positioning-related challenges rather than general enteral nutrition barriers. All interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Four main themes emerged that were uniquely shaped by prone positioning context: (1) prone positioning-specific care prioritization conflicts (airway management during prone position competing with feeding schedules), (2) prone positioning-specific resource demands (specialized positioning equipment, temperature monitoring during restricted patient access), (3) lack of prone positioning-specific training protocols, and (4) communication barriers regarding prone positioning timing and feeding coordination.
This study identifies four key barriers that are uniquely amplified or created by the prone positioning context: the conflict between prone positioning-specific airway management and feeding schedules, increased resource demands for specialized positioning care, absence of prone positioning-specific training curricula, and coordination challenges between positioning schedules and enteral nutrition timing.

PMID:
42436505
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement