Problem-based and related learning approaches in family medicine residency: a scoping review of four countries.

Authors

Megan Clemens, Josheil Kaur Boparai, Russell Dawe, Susan Avery

Published in

Canadian medical education journal. Volume 17. Issue 3. Pages 88-106. Epub Jun 26, 2026.

Abstract

Postgraduate medical education (PGME) bridges the transition from medical school to independent practice. Problem-based learning (PBL), widely used in undergraduate medical education, has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional lectures in PGME. However, its impact on family medicine training remains unclear.
In this scoping review, we describe the use of PBL in family medicine PGME programs and examine its educational and healthcare-related outcomes.
Using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, we conducted a scoping review of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and ProQuest in January 2025. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracting and synthesizing data according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, illustrating diverse PBL delivery methods in family medicine PGME. Programs integrated PBL as standalone sessions, an adjunct, or blended with traditional methods. Learning groups often included mixed specialties (e.g., family medicine and internal medicine) and varied learner levels (e.g., residents and attending physicians). Most studies reported high learner satisfaction and improved perceptions of topics; however, objective assessments of knowledge, pre- and post-PBL, showed no significant improvement. Limited data on behavior and patient outcomes suggested potential benefits.
PBL in family medicine PGME appears to enhance engagement and satisfaction but shows mixed educational outcomes. Further research is needed to determine its optimal role in training.

PMID:
42436928
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 12 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.