What Does It Really Mean to Support Exclusive Breastfeeding in Southern Africa? It's Time to Shift the Paradigm.

Authors

Kathleen M Powis, Lyra S Johnson, Zoya-Maria R Aoun, Sara R Schenkel, Jennifer A Smit, Nzwakie Mosery, Gosego Masasa, Samuel Kgole, Christina Psaros

Published in

Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association. Pages 8903344261452911. Jul 12, 2026. Epub Jul 12, 2026.

Abstract

Breastfeeding is one of the most cost-effective health interventions in existence, improving child survival through improved health and nutritional status and providing numerous benefits to the mother, including lowering the risk of breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer. Current WHO guidelines recommend exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) for the first 6 months of an infant's life, which Ministries of Health across Southern Africa support. However, rates of EBF in this region, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa, vary widely and fail to reach global targets. Botswana and South Africa offer specific examples of this variation. Need to return to work has been highlighted as a significant barrier to sustained EBF among women who initiate EBF. Broader workplace structures and expectations for women hinder EBF, particularly in Southern Africa. The informal sector, which employs the majority of women in Southern Africa, often lacks labor protections and social benefits. Conditions within the workplace or at school are also not conducive to the specific demands of EBF, without dedicated space to express milk, facilities to safely store breastmilk, or protected time for breastmilk expression. Guidelines around how best to support breastfeeding women vary widely, and few lay out specific strategies to support EBF in the workplace. Women, regardless of where they live, deserve the choice to elect EBF for their infant. Persistent barriers to EBF prevent postpartum women and their infants, particularly in Southern Africa, from realizing its countless benefits.

PMID:
42437476
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.