Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Home-cage monitoring as a sensitive tool for detecting subtle behavioral alterations following mild traumatic brain injury.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Bar Richmond-Hacham, Chaim G Pick, Lior Bikovski

Published in

Experimental neurology. Pages 115929. Jul 12, 2026. Epub Jul 12, 2026.

Abstract

Home-cage monitoring (HCM) has emerged as a powerful approach for detecting subtle and context-dependent behavioral alterations in rodent models. In this mini-review, we integrate clinical observations and preclinical data from the closed-head weight-drop model, emphasizing studies from our laboratory, to argue that mTBI should be conceptualized as a disorder of behavioral regulation rather than of basic behavioral capacity. We first outline the limitations of short, novelty-driven gold-standard assays (e.g., Open Field, Elevated Plus Maze, Rotarod), which often indicate intact motor function and no robust anxiety-like behavior in mTBI mice, despite converging evidence of neural and clinical dysfunction. We then summarize the converging HCM findings, demonstrating circadian disruption, altered habituation trajectories, residual avoidance, and changes in the microstructure of wheel-running. These long-duration, stress-free measures uncover fine-grained temporal signatures that closely parallel post-concussion syndrome in humans, including disturbed sleep-wake regulation, heightened stress sensitivity, and cognitive inflexibility. Finally, we propose practical recommendations for integrating HCM with standard behavioral assays and highlight candidate digital behavioral biomarkers relevant to mTBI. Taken together, the evidence supports a conceptual shift toward adopting continuous HCM-derived metrics as core outcome measures.

PMID:
42437586
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement