Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

CCC-MMTN: towards robust classification of confusable modulations in few-shot scenarios.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Minghui Gao, Binquan Zhang, Lu Wang, Xiaogang Tang, Hao Huan

Published in

Scientific reports. Jul 12, 2026. Epub Jul 12, 2026.

Abstract

Automatic modulation classification (AMC) serves as a fundamental task in non-cooperative communication systems, playing a crucial role in signal detection and demodulation. However, acquiring a sufficient number of high-quality labeled samples in real-world scenarios remains challenging, often resulting in insufficient training of end-to-end AMC networks and limited classification performance. To enhance the discrimination of easily confused modulation types and improve overall accuracy under few-shot conditions, this paper introduces a complex-valued circular convolutional meta multi-task network (CCC-MMTN). The proposed framework integrates meta-learning to extract discriminative features from limited data and adopts a multi-task strategy with an alternating local-global training mechanism to facilitate knowledge transfer and strengthen classification robustness. At its core, a complex-valued circular convolutional network (CCCN) is designed as the feature extractor to effectively capture temporal and complex-domain characteristics of communication signals. Extensive experiments on the RML2016.10a dataset demonstrate that, using only five samples per modulation type at a single signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) across eight modulation formats, our method achieves average accuracy rate of 77.35% (-20 dB to 18 dB). The method also achieves an overall accuracy of 84.09% through physical validation with 7 modulation types (50 samples per type) under random SNR conditions, confirming its real-world classification performance.

PMID:
42437830
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement