Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Age as a Predictor of Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification in Systematic Prostate Biopsy.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Coskun Bostanci, Kazim Erdem

Published in

Archivos espanoles de urologia. Volume 79. Issue 5. Pages 808-814.

Abstract

To evaluate the correlation between age and prostate pathological outcomes obtained through systematic transrectal prostate biopsy in 50- to 80-year-old patients with prostate-specific antigen levels ranging from 2.5 to 25 ng/mL.
This retrospective study included 1079 patients aged 50-80 years who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. The patients were divided into two primary age groups: 50-65 years and 66-80 years. Additionally, the patients were stratified into six 5-year age subgroups (50-55, 56-60, 61-65, 66-70, 71-75, and 76-80 years). Pathological outcomes were compared between these primary age groups and subgroups.
The prostate cancer detection rate increased from 27.6% in patients aged 50-65 years to 46.4% in those aged 66-80 years (p < = 0.001). Clinically significant prostate cancer was more frequent in patients older than 70 years. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade groups 3 and 4 were significantly more common in patients aged 76-80 years than in those under 70 years (p < = 0.001). No significant differences were observed for the ISUP grade groups 2 and 5. For grade group 1, a significant difference was found only between the 61-65 and 66-70-year age groups.
This study revealed that the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer and higher ISUP grade groups (especially grades 3 and 4) increased notably after age 65 years. These findings highlight the importance of age-adjusted risk assessment and individualized prostate-specific antigen screening and biopsy strategies. Further prospective studies are needed to refine protocols for older patients.

PMID:
42438876
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement