Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

No Sex Differences in the Amount of Type IV Collagen in Wistar Rats Regardless of Sampling Strategy.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Patrik Mik, Katsiaryna Barannikava, Polina Surkova, Richard Pálek, Jáchym Rosendorf, Štěpánka Jansová, Václav Liška, Zbyněk Tonar

Published in

APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Volume 134. Issue 7. Pages e70236.

Abstract

Serum collagen IV (Col IV) is an important marker for staging liver fibrosis, but histological baselines in healthy tissue are often lacking or biased. This study applied unbiased stereological sampling to quantify liver Col IV in healthy adult Wistar rats and assess sex differences. No significant differences were observed between sampling strategies (simple, systematic, or stratified random) or between males (4.26% ± 0.93%) and females (3.71% ± 1.27%), yielding a pooled mean of 3.96% ± 1.11%. The Col IV-positive area (3.62% ± 1.29%) did not differ significantly from the total collagen area measured by Sirius red (3.06% ± 1.72%), although a statistical trend was noted (R2 = 0.5845, p = 0.0767). These data indicate that IHC-based area measurements capture a larger structural footprint of the mesh-like Col IV network than biochemical mass-based methods, and that 58% of the variance in Col IV area is explained by Sirius red-positive area, suggesting a regulated spatial balance. The absence of sex effects on Col IV implies that previously reported sex-related differences in total liver collagen likely involve other collagen types. Unbiased Col IV quantification may support validation of minimally invasive methods for staging liver fibrosis.

PMID:
42439020
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement