Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Endothelial protein C receptor expression as a marker of reduced metastatic risk in primary melanoma.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Takayuki Fusumae, Takeru Funakoshi, Ikuko Hirai, Yoshio Nakamura, Keitaro Fukuda, Takashi Iwata, Masayuki Amagai, Keiji Tanese

Published in

Melanoma research. Jul 14, 2026. Epub Jul 14, 2026.

Abstract

Malignant melanoma has a strong propensity for early metastatic dissemination, yet conventional clinicopathological predictors such as Breslow thickness do not fully capture individual metastatic risk. The endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) exerts context-dependent functions across malignancies, but its clinical significance in melanoma remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed primary tumor specimens from 62 patients with invasive melanoma; 61 with complete outcome data formed the analytic cohort for metastasis analyses. EPCR expression in melanoma cells was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using semi-quantitative intensity and extent scores (0-3). Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were graded according to the Melanoma Institute Australia scoring system. Higher EPCR expression was associated with lower odds of documented lymph-node and distant metastatic involvement. In prespecified parsimonious multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for tumor thickness and ulceration, higher EPCR extent remained independently associated with reduced lymph-node involvement (adjusted odds ratio: 0.36, 95% confidence interval:, 0.17-0.70). EPCR expression showed a positive association with CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scores. Higher EPCR expression in primary melanoma was independently associated with reduced lymph-node involvement and with a CD8+-inflamed tumor microenvironment, suggesting EPCR may complement conventional pathological predictors of metastatic risk.

PMID:
42440262
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement