Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Image quality enhancement of small field-of-view cone-beam CT for image-guided radiotherapy using a structure-preserving cycle-consistent generative adversarial network.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Idzuru Yoshinaga, Sho Ozaki, Hideki Obara, Masahiko Aoki

Published in

Radiological physics and technology. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is widely used for patient positioning in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), but full-fan CBCT, which reduces patient dose and acquisition time, suffers from a smaller field of view (FOV) and degraded image quality. To address this limitation, we developed a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based image translation framework, specifically a Cycle-consistent GAN (CycleGAN), to enhance small-FOV CBCT images. The method incorporates dedicated preprocessing and multiple structure-preserving loss functions to mitigate boundary effects caused by truncation of patient anatomy. The model was trained and evaluated on CBCT and planning CT (PlanCT) images from prostate cancer patients. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach substantially improved soft-tissue contrast, reduced noise, and preserved anatomical structures, as confirmed by Hounsfield unit statistics, histogram analysis, and noised SelfSSIM metrics. Importantly, the generated images exhibited image characteristics comparable to PlanCT, supporting accurate patient positioning. These findings indicate that the proposed GAN-based framework effectively enhances the image quality of small-FOV CBCT while maintaining anatomical fidelity, offering practical potential for clinical IGRT workflows.

PMID:
42440060
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement