Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Preoperative predictors of early recurrence after neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 in resectable pancreatic cancer: a multicenter study.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Yoshihiro Shirai, Ryoga Hamura, Masashi Tsunematsu, Takeshi Gocho, Taro Sakamoto, Shinji Onda, Yoshiaki Tanji, Norimitsu Okui, Michinori Matsumoto, Kenei Furukawa, Koichiro Haruki, Toru Ikegami

Published in

Surgery today. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently recurs early after resection, resulting in a poor prognosis. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1 (NAC-GS) is the standard strategy in Japan, predictors of early recurrence (ER) remain unclear.
We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent NAC-GS followed by pancreatectomy at four institutions. ER was defined as recurrence within 6 months of surgery. Clinicopathological variables were evaluated to identify the predictors of ER.
ER occurred in 9% of patients and was independently associated with significantly worse overall survival. Tumor progression during NAC-GS and elevated pre-treatment CA19-9 levels (> 292 U/mL) were identified as independent preoperative predictors of ER. A novel scoring system incorporating these factors effectively stratified ER risk (ER rates: 1%, 13%, and 100% for scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively; AUC = 0.85). The score was also associated with the long-term prognosis.
Tumor progression during NAC-GS and elevated CA19-9 levels are significant predictors of ER in patients with resectable PDAC. The proposed scoring system may aid in identifying patients who could benefit from alternative or intensified treatment strategies.

PMID:
42439926
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement