Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and reliability of the Turkish version of the spinal cord injury Pain Instrument.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Yunus Emre Tütüneken, Nurgül Dürüstkan Elbaşi

Published in

The journal of spinal cord medicine. Pages 1-8. Jul 13, 2026. Epub Jul 13, 2026.

Abstract

This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the spinal cord injury Pain Instrument (SCIPI) into Turkish and assess its validity and reliability for screening neuropathic pain (NP) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
A prospective cross-sectional study.
The study was carried out at the Istinye University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Application and Research Center.
Forty people with SCI.
Not applicable.
Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (ICC), and construct validity (correlation with Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4] and Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) were evaluated. Bland-Altman analysis assessed measurement agreement.
The T-SCIPI exhibited acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.778) and excellent test-retest reliability across all items (ICC = 0.871-0.965). Bland-Altman analysis indicated no systematic bias. Construct validity was confirmed by strong correlations with DN4 (r = 0.747, P < 0.001) and VAS pain intensity (r = 0.684, P < 0.001). No floor or ceiling effects were detected.
The T-SCIPI is a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate tool for screening NP in Turkish-speaking people with SCI. Its brevity and ease of administration enhance its utility in clinical practice and research, facilitating early NP identification and management in this population.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06990243..

PMID:
42440306
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement