Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Diet and ileostomy: a qualitative comparison of patient and healthcare professional perspectives in the United Kingdom and Australia.

Created on 13 Jul 2026

Authors

Niamh Magee, Ellen E A Simpson, Helen McCarthy, Pauline Douglas, Erika Rosbotham, L Kirsty Pourshahidi, James Davis, Martin Veysey, Nenad Naumovski, Chris I R Gill

Published in

European journal of nutrition. Volume 65. Issue 5. Jun 15, 2026. Epub Jun 15, 2026.

Abstract

Ileostomy formation requires major dietary adjustments to prevent complications and maintain nutritional status, yet dietary advice is often inconsistent, and evidence guiding best practice remains limited. This study explored how people living with an ileostomy (ileostomates) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) experience and support dietary management, uniquely comparing UK and Australian perspectives.
Fifty semi-structured interviews were conducted with ileostomates (n = 26) and HCPs (n = 12 stoma care nurses, n = 12 dietitians) across the UK and Australia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis guided by the Social Ecological Model (SEM).
Seven main categories emerged, spanning intrapersonal, interpersonal, community, institutional and public policy factors. Ileostomates reported persistent dietary restriction, fear of food bolus blockages, and reliance on online forums when HCP follow up was limited. HCP transcripts highlighted variations in practice, constrained caseloads, and gaps in evidence underpinning dietary guidance. Country-specific differences were observed, with Australian ileostomates emphasising hydration and geographical barriers. HCPs in the UK highlighted reinforcement of advice from a stoma nurse or dietitian as being central to dietary reintroduction, whereas their Australian counterparts prioritised a patient-led approach.
Findings reveal systemic gaps in dietary support across both countries and highlight the need for individualised support, improved professional training, and integration of digital or telehealth solutions to enhance accessibility and continuity of care.

PMID:
42439965
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 13 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement